3
Under sec. 5 of the Supreme Corvet Hat of Hory Kory (Nos of 1873) the
Disage
laus
Lei
of Ery land as
ow 5 it
Afer., 1843 arr
les force
in tray
Когу ust been
Matuts.
so far as they hey have mos tres ley local
th Roberts. Neay
J. H. Tompson
The Hong Kong Marriage Ordinance is mainly
concerned with the registration of marriages
and does not anywhere lay down what form of
marriage shall be recognised as valid.
Section 27 says that all marriages celebrated
under this Ordinance shall be good and valid
in law to all intents and purposes, but I
do not know whether we are entitled to assume
from that, that a marriage not celebrated
in accordance with the Ordinance, would be
invalid.
If the English law is neld to
apply, the question would seem to turn as to ou
whether the marriage was registered,
as to
which we have no information. May we have
your observationsadvice?
فسهاجر
Hi zeems that the cumulat.
3.1631
effect I
menticand above is to affely the English procedur, but in any case,
in Ordcas
I think this should to referred & Hang
not only
Kong who shanded to ath I say (a) what is the law there grusally as Javish marriages boul
but also
(6) whether this particican marriage
in valcit
12.11.31
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.